$540 billion global food waste bill exposed for 2026

$540 billion global food waste bill exposed for 2026
  • Economists estimate the cost of food waste across a business’ supply chain (processing to retail) to be equivalent to 33% of total revenue on average 

  • A lack of visibility is compounding issues, with 61% of retail and supply chain leaders saying that they do not have full view of food waste across the supply chain

  • Transit remains a major blind spot across the supply chain, with 56% stating a lack of understanding of where waste happens when food is being transported 

  • Meat is the most challenging area and is projected to cost $94 billion in 2026, nearly a fifth of the total economic cost of food waste ($540bn)

MENTOR, OH – January 6, 2026 — Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY), As businesses return from 2025’s holiday trading season, new data has revealed that food waste continues to erode margins and is one of the most costly, yet hidden, challenges in the global retail supply chain. 

 

This is according to the Making the Invisible Visible: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Food Waste to Drive Growth and Profitability report, published today by Avery Dennison, a global materials science and digital identification solutions company. Independent modeling warns that the economic cost of food waste across the global supply chain is forecast to reach $540 billion by 2026, up from $526 billion last year.

 

In addition, the report findings show that, on average, food waste costs are equivalent to 33% of total revenues in the food retail supply chain annually from post-farm up to the point-of-sale.

 

Extensive research involving 3,500 global food retailers and supply chain leaders reveals that, despite growing awareness, 61% of businesses say they still lack full visibility into where food waste occurs across their operations. Limited influence over the most waste-intensive areas of the supply chain is a common challenge, highlighting the urgent need for targeted innovation and cross-supply chain collaboration.

 

The data highlights how leaders are consistently challenged at various points throughout the supply chain and most specifically across perishables. When asked to identify the three most difficult categories for waste, half pointed to meat (50%), 45% cited produce, and 28% mentioned baked goods. Over half (51%) of business leaders said that inventory management and overstocking contribute significantly to food waste within their operations. Tackling this will require a combination of solutions, including item-level inventory visibility, demand forecasting and real-time shelf-life management.

 

Transit remains a connecting thread between the different perishable categories, with 56% of companies reporting that they do not have a clear understanding of how much food waste happens when goods are being transported. 

 

If current trends continue, the cumulative cost of food waste from 2025 to 2030 is expected to reach $3.4 trillion, coinciding with the 2030 deadline for the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, which aims to halve global food waste. Despite this goal, the report uncovered that over a quarter (27%) of leaders said that they would not meet the 2030 deadline.

 

Julie Vargas, VP/GM, Enterprise Intelligent Labels Growth, Avery Dennison, says: “Food waste has become an accepted cost of doing business, but it doesn’t have to be. Innovation exists today to help overcome the complexity of food waste by unlocking new possibilities and transforming a historic operating cost into measurable value across the global retail supply chain.

 

“The retail ecosystem is changing, but not enough retailers are changing with it. The biggest challenge is what we can’t see. From transit to shelf, blind spots are silently eroding margins. With the right innovation, we can turn this loss into measurable value and shift the conversation on food waste, from being purely seen as a sustainability issue, into a business critical one. This is about unlocking efficiency and growth across the entire supply chain.”

 

A high cost challenge intensified by the holiday season

 

Meat has emerged as one of the most difficult categories for waste management, with 72% of supply chain leaders citing it as their biggest challenge. Given its high unit cost in grocery and food retail, even small reductions in waste can deliver significant financial gains. Economic modeling forecasts meat waste to amount to $94 billion in lost output across the global supply chain in 2026, almost one fifth of the total cumulative loss across the year, with fresh produce closely behind at $88 billion.

 

Just ahead of peak season trading results are announced, Avery Dennison found that over two thirds of businesses (67%) were predicting that meat waste during the holiday season was expected to noticeably reduce their margins and that managing this issue over one of the busiest times of the year had become a bigger operational concern than before (69%). 

 

For retailers, pressures presented by economic volatility, poor adaptability to market-related shocks and difficulty adjusting to shifting consumer demands are exacerbating systemic food waste issues. Almost three quarters (74%) of retailers admit inflation is making it harder than ever to predict demand for fresh meat and 73% report a rising demand amongst consumers for smaller meat portions or alternatives.

 

Michael Colarossi, VP, head of enterprise sustainability, Avery Dennison, adds: “For too long, food waste has been positioned almost exclusively as a sustainability and societal issue. We must recognize it as the business opportunity it truly is. In fact, over seven in ten (73%) business leaders told us that they see tackling food waste as a growth opportunity. That’s why the $540 billion in lost value should be a clear call to action for the food retail supply chain to cut waste and boost efficiencies. Only by uncovering the blind spots in the chain can we take meaningful steps to reduce loss, build resilience and create lasting value for both businesses and the planet.”

 

To explore steps that supply chain, grocery and CPG leaders can take to tackle food waste, download the report.

 


1
Avery Dennison commissioned the Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr) to understand the financial value of food waste. The economists expressed financial costs in GVA terms.

2 The cumulative total of food waste in GVA from 2025 - 2030, as calculated by the Cebr and accounting for food inflation forecasts (generated with an understanding of outlook indicators from the World Bank and IMF that include population and living standards)

3 UN SDG 12.3 https://globalgoals.org/goals/12-responsible-consumption-and-production/

4 Of those businesses who handle meat

Notes to editors

 

About the research, report and methodology:

  • Research commissioned by Avery Dennison 

  • Quantitative research conducted by Censuswide between 13 June 2025 – 26 June 2025

  • Total survey respondents: 3,502

Respondent profile:

  • 3,502 senior-level decision makers and sustainability leaders involved in food retail or the broader food value chain

  • A total of 500 supply chain leaders were surveyed in each of the following seven markets: United States, Germany, France, China, Brazil. 501 were surveyed in the UK and India

  • The majority of businesses had revenues of over $750,000 annually 

  • Censuswide abides by and employs members of the Market Research Society and follows the MRS code of conduct and ESOMAR principles. Censuswide is also a member of the British Polling Council.

Economic research: Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr)


Cebr found that the average cost of food waste across the supply chain (from processing to retail) for a business is equivalent to 33% of its turnover, globally. The quantitative survey found this percentage at a country level too.

To estimate the wider economic impact of this, Cebr applied this percentage to food supply chain revenues from each participating country’s national accounts. Next, a GVA-to-turnover ratio was applied, arriving at both country-specific and total economic output figures.

We deliberately avoided converting revenue % figures into a monetary value as this risked double-counting inputs that go into the business's products and the subsequent food waste downstream, throughout the supply chain, thereby artificially inflating figures.

Instead, using GVA (Gross Value Added) allowed the economists to strip out intermediate costs and avoid compounding losses already accounted for earlier in the chain.

Definition of GVA


GVA measures the value a company creates by taking its total output (sales) and subtracting the cost of inputs (i.e. raw materials, services to make the product).

By converting food waste reported as a share of turnover into GVA, the analysis isolates the true value lost at each stage — ensuring waste is not counted multiple times.

About Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison Corporation (NYSE: AVY) is a global materials science and digital identification solutions company. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that help advance the industries we serve, providing branding and information solutions that optimize labor and supply chain efficiency, reduce waste, advance sustainability, circularity and transparency, and better connect brands and consumers. We design and develop labeling and functional materials, radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays and tags, software applications that connect the physical and digital, and offerings that enhance branded packaging and carry or display information that improves the customer experience. Serving industries worldwide — including home and personal care, apparel, general retail, e-commerce, logistics, food and grocery, pharmaceuticals and automotive — we employ approximately 35,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Our reported sales in 2024 were $8.8 billion. Learn more at www.averydennison.com.

Media contact

For interviews, data requests or further information, please contact:

 

Aime Hammond
Aime.Hammond@eu.averydennison.com